Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Do Jews and Catholics Get Along?”

Q: If Jesus was a Jew, why then do Catholics and Jews not get along? – K.C.

Officially, Catholics and Jews do get along, in the sense that there is high-level interaction between the Holy See and many bishops and ordinary Catholics with Jews.

Historically there were problems in the past because of a faulty idea that the Jews alone were responsible for the death of Our Lord.

The Catechism says: Jews are not collectively responsible for Jesus’ death.

597 The historical complexity of Jesus’ trial is apparent in the Gospel accounts. The personal sin of the participants (Judas, the Sanhedrin, Pilate) is known to God alone. Hence we cannot lay responsibility for the trial on the Jews in Jerusalem as a whole, despite the outcry of a manipulated crowd and the global reproaches contained in the apostles’ calls to conversion after Pentecost. Jesus himself, in forgiving them on the cross, and Peter in following suit, both accept ‘the ignorance’ of the Jews of Jerusalem and even of their leaders. Still less can we extend responsibility to other Jews of different times and places, based merely on the crowd’s cry: ‘His blood be on us and on our children!’, a formula for ratifying a judicial sentence. As the Church declared at the Second Vatican Council: ‘… [N]either all Jews indiscriminately at that time, nor Jews today, can be charged with the crimes committed during his Passion…. [T]he Jews should not be spoken of as rejected or accursed as if this followed from holy Scripture.'”

I hope this helps.

“Ask a Priest: Do Jews and Catholics Get Along?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Is There Reincarnation?”

Q: What is the Catholic Church’s stance/teaching on past lives and reincarnation? I’m a recent Catholic, although I’m 41. I saw an article today on Catholic Online that concerns me. – R.D.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A. The short answer is, there is no reincarnation. The Catechism in No. 1013 says:

“Death is the end of man’s earthly pilgrimage, of the time of grace and mercy which God offers him so as to work out his earthly life in keeping with the divine plan, and to decide his ultimate destiny. When ‘the single course of our earthly life’ is completed, we shall not return to other earthly lives: ‘It is appointed for men to die once.’ There is no ‘reincarnation’ after death.”

That article you cited, about a person who reported a death experience, is a different kind of thing. Perhaps God grants certain people the grace of a glimpse of the beyond. I say “glimpse” because if a soul really saw God, the soul would be so overwhelmed that it wouldn’t come back to this world.

There are, of course, precedents for coming-back-to-life experiences in the Gospel. Jesus raised people from the dead. But what they experienced before being brought back to life is a mystery.

Suffice it to say, though, these are not cases of reincarnation. Reincarnation holds that people die and then return to the world in some other form or other body. The back-from-death cases in the Gospels, in contrast, deal with continuity in the existence of individual persons.

The upshot: Make the most of your life. You only get one in this world, and then you go to Our Lord and give an account for how you lived it.

“Ask a Priest: Is There Reincarnation?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: How Can the God Depicted in the Old Testament Be Worshipped?”

Q: I was forced into the Catholic Church when I was a baby by my father, the choice was taken from me and I blindly followed what was taught to me. In 1999 I read the Bible for the first time, New and Old Testaments, and was appalled with what I read and instantly distanced myself from this fear-driven, sick organization. I hope you appreciate me telling you my feelings and don’t think I’m writing this simply to upset you or your faith. I do, however, know the Bible’s teachings are morally bankrupt and evil. How can you worship a God that kills men women and children for simply not believing? God told Moses to kill thousands of innocents. God sends his own children to a hell he made for being who they are, whether gay, straight or nonbeliever. What makes me angry is that I marry my Asian wife in a few months and have five beautiful whom I adore and love. The God you worship is sending them to an eternity of pain and suffering because they love Buddha’s teachings and don’t believe in your God as the creator. How do you worship such a God? – A.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A. When you say you were forced into the Church as a baby, you probably mean that you were baptized as an infant. In other words, you dad wanted to give you the best he had to offer: food, clothing, protection, love — and the sacrament that took away original sin and made you a member of the mystical body of Christ, his Church.

Christ doesn’t want us to blindly follow him. He wants us to use our faith as well as our reason.

In 1999 you discovered what other people have known for centuries: The Bible has a lot of brutal stuff in it. Does this mean that Christianity is based on fear and revenge? No, of course not.

The Bible, especially parts of the Old Testament, needs to be read and understood in context.

It helps to say right away what the Old Testament is not. It is not a “Lives of the Saints.” Nor is it a simple handbook for moral behavior. It isn’t even a single book; rather it is an anthology of books that records a dialogue of sorts between God and the Israelites, and the Israelites among themselves over many centuries.

Its contents include history, allegories, psalms, poetry and stories steeped in symbols (to transmit deep truths). At times it contains passages that try to interpret past events, sometimes in opposing ways. The Old Testament doesn’t fit neatly into any one category of literature. It is much too complex.

Picking out a few passages here and there in the Old Testament and concluding that that is what Christianity is about is like pulling a few lines from yesterday’s newspaper and concluding that that is the way the world is. Those lines might reflect individual events or interpretations of events, but they aren’t the whole picture.

Interestingly, some of the brutal passages in the Old Testament about the orders to kill Canaanites (men, women and children) were probably compiled at a time when the Canaanites were no longer even in the vicinity of the Israelites. Those passages would need to be understood, then, not as a call to wholesale slaughter, but as a reminder to the Israelites that they had to radically cut with any groups that could lead them away from God.

Suffice it to say that the ancient Israelites were a work in progress. We shouldn’t try to project modern standards of behavior on them, nor take all of their behavior as a model for us.

God’s ultimate revelation was his Son, Jesus Christ. The Old Testament pointed toward the coming of Jesus. So if we want to know who or what best expresses the heart of God in Scripture, it is Jesus. And Jesus is what the Catholic Church is about. He is the head of the Church. He founded it. He guides it.

The question might linger, however, about why God inspired the compilation of an Old Testament so rife with violence.

One answer might be that it is the brutality we see in antiquity that helps us to appreciate the radicalness of Christ’s teaching about love and mercy. Talk of love and mercy isn’t absent in the Old Testament, of course, but the widespread brutality we find there is certainly absent in the New Testament.

Another answer might be that the sheer complexity of Scripture requires a bit of humility from us. We cannot simply interpret Scripture on our own. We need the guidance of a believing community to help us. In a word, Catholics interpret it in the light of Tradition — the living transmission of the message of the Gospel in the Church.

Now, as for non-Christians and God’s attitude toward them, the Catholic Church certainly does not teach that they are lost.

The Vatican II document Lumen Gentium is worth quoting here, specifically its part that focuses on non-Christians. This part deals with the Jews:

“16. Finally, those who have not yet received the Gospel are related in various ways to the people of God. In the first place we must recall the people to whom the testament and the promises were given and from whom Christ was born according to the flesh. On account of their fathers this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts He makes nor of the calls He issues.”

The section then refers to followers of Islam:

“But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind.”

Then the document casts a wider net:

“Nor is God far distant from those who in shadows and images seek the unknown God, for it is He who gives to all men life and breath and all things, and as Savior wills that all men be saved. Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. Nor does Divine Providence deny the helps necessary for salvation to those who, without blame on their part, have not yet arrived at an explicit knowledge of God and with His grace strive to live a good life. Whatever good or truth is found amongst them is looked upon by the Church as a preparation for the Gospel.”

That hardly sounds like the language of condemnation of non-Christians.

To sum up the Catholic view of the Almighty: God is a God of love. He sent his only Son to suffer and die for all of us. That is the message that Christians are supposed to share with the world. That we don’t do a better job of that is a bad reflection on us, not on God.

I could only invite you to browse the Catechism and read for yourself what the Church teaches (and doesn’t teach). Pope Francis has called for a Year of Mercy, which we are in the middle of, to remind us of God’s love and desire for all people to be saved.

Perhaps that is a facet of the Almighty that can bring you peace.

“Ask a Priest: How Can the God Depicted in the Old Testament Be Worshipped?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Should We Make the Sign of the Cross at Communion?”

Q: I was not taught to make the sign of the cross immediately after receiving Communion. I notice, however, that many Catholics do make the sign of the cross at that time. Should we make the sign of the cross after receiving the Blessed Sacrament? Or what is the Church’s teaching on this subject? – S.M.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: The rubrics don’t call for the faithful to cross themselves after receiving Communion. If a person wants to do it, as a personal act of piety, there is nothing that stops him, however.

The Church asks that we receive Communion reverently, either by slightly bowing before receiving (if we receive standing up) or by kneeling (which is always an option). Communicants should respond with “Amen” when the minister says, “The Body of Christ” or “The Blood of Christ.”

One word of caution regarding crossing oneself: It isn’t advisable to do it too quickly after receiving Communion. If a person raises his hand too quickly to cross himself, he risks striking the ciborium or chalice, which could cause an accident with the Eucharist. Before making the sign of the cross it is better for the communicant to wait a second for some distance to open up between himself and the minister.

“Ask a Priest: Should We Make the Sign of the Cross at Communion?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What Should We Make of Ancient Faiths?”

Q: We now have a decent understanding of ancient civilizations, and with that understanding comes knowledge of their religious practices. I would like to know how these ancient faiths are viewed in Catholicism. These religions were generated before Christ, and many before Judaism, and they had thousands if not millions of devout followers. Also, many were polytheistic, so any indication that they were perhaps worshipping the same God that we worship today is destroyed because they worshipped many gods. One thing that hit me especially hard was learning about how ancient Mayans used to compete in their sport, and the winner of these games would be allowed to be the individual who was sacrificed. This hit me hard because it showed me just how devout these individuals were to their faith, and obviously the glory of our God had nothing to do with their devotion. So, in God’s eyes, what were these people doing? And what makes Catholicism so much more legitimate than their faiths? It seems their belief was just as strong as most Catholics; was God simply happy to be idle until revealing the truth around the time of Moses and thereafter? – J.R.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: You raise big questions! A proper answer would require a book-length e-mail. But perhaps a few observations could help here. Let me try to address some of your specific questions.

— I would like to know how these ancient faiths are viewed in Catholicism?

Let me preface my observation with a very quick overview of salvation history.

After the fall in the Garden of Eden, God promised a redeemer (see Genesis 3:15. God in his wisdom didn’t send the redeemer right away; in fact, the world had to wait a long time for the coming of Christ.

One theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, likened this delay to the case of a patient battling an illness. Sometimes medicine can’t be given to a sick person right away. It takes time for an illness to run its course, before the medicine can be effective. The same could be said of the world. It had to let the illness of sin runs its course for a while before the cure (Jesus) could be administered.

Now, man, who is made in the image of God, always looks for something transcendent. He looks for ways to understand what life is about. He looks for ways to connect with a deity that he intuits is “up there somewhere.”

Hence, various cultures and peoples who didn’t know about Christ or the Triune God developed ways of searching for the transcendent, of giving what they believed was glory to the deity or deities they believed in. In other words, they groped in the darkness. But at least they were searching for something.

So what does the Church think about these ancient religions? It recognizes that there were probably sparks of the truth in them. But it also holds that the fullness of truth was revealed in Jesus Christ. (For more reading see the declaration “Dominus Iesus“.

How will God judge peoples who practiced those ancient faiths? He will certainly judge them differently (that is, less strictly) than he will judge those of us who should know better.

Permit me to quote at length a passage from the Second Vatican Council document on the Church, Lumen Gentium, No 16:

“Finally, those who have not yet received the Gospel are related in various ways to the people of God. In the first place we must recall the people to whom the testament and the promises were given and from whom Christ was born according to the flesh. On account of their fathers this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts He makes nor of the calls He issues. But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind. Nor is God far distant from those who in shadows and images seek the unknown God, for it is He who gives to all men life and breath and all things, and as Savior wills that all men be saved. Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. Nor does Divine Providence deny the helps necessary for salvation to those who, without blame on their part, have not yet arrived at an explicit knowledge of God and with His grace strive to live a good life. Whatever good or truth is found among them is looked upon by the Church as a preparation for the Gospel. She knows that it is given by Him who enlightens all men so that they may finally have life. But often men, deceived by the Evil One, have become vain in their reasonings and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, serving the creature rather than the Creator.”

— So, in God’s eyes, what were these people doing? And what makes Catholicism so much more legitimate than their faiths? It seems their belief was just as strong as most Catholics, was God simply happy to be idle until revealing the truth around the time of Moses and thereafter?

As mentioned, God probably recognized that these ancient peoples were trying to express some kind of worship to some kind of deity. Religion comes naturally to people; we are built to reach out to the infinite.

Why is Catholicism more legitimate? Because the Church is founded by Jesus Christ, the Son of God who took on human nature and walked among us. Our beliefs are what Jesus taught. Jesus is the height of God’s revelation in the world.

The fact that ancient people felt strongly about their faith — maybe even more strongly than some Christians feel about their faith — might speak to the sincerity of these folks. But intensity of belief is a separate issue from whether someone actually has the truth. Today, for instance, there are terrorists who believe strongly that their faith allows and encourages them to kill innocent people. The intensity of their belief doesn’t make their ideas true.

As for God’s timing, yes, there is something mysterious about it. It is kind of remarkable that he started to reveal himself more intensely to individuals and peoples in very specific locations in the Middle East, at very specific times of history. But then, Jesus entered the world in a specific time and place, too. The meaning of his Incarnation and what it means for us is the kind of topic that could fill a small library with books. As for the ancients who didn’t know of Jesus or of the God of Israel, suffice is to say that somehow the Almighty gave them assistance in their journey through life.

What is the upshot of all this? We could say that our faith, our baptism, our knowledge of Jesus Christ is a great grace. Not everyone has had that grace. And that means that God will expect more from us who know of Jesus. He will hold us to a high standard at Judgment Day.

“Ask a Priest: What Should We Make of Ancient Faiths?” Read More »

The One Thing Needed | A Regnum Christi Retreat Guide on Martha and Mary with Fr. John Bartunek, LC

The One Thing Needed: A Retreat Guide on Martha and Mary

Today’s world offers us so much!  Wherever we go, products and possibilities battle raucously for our attention and our commitment.  Visual noise, mind noise, noise noise… Amidst all the noise, how can we focus on what really matters? In this Retreat Guide, One Thing Needed: A Retreat Guide on Martha and Mary, that’s what we will reflect on.

  • The first meditation looks at what Jesus calls “the one thing needed.”
  • The second meditation looks at the relationship between that one thing and all the other things that make up our daily life.
  • And the conference reviews God’s own not-so-secret formula for helping us keep our priorities straight: the Third Commandment.

Video

Audio

The One Thing Needed: A Retreat Guide on Martha and Mary Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: I Feel Drawn Back to the Church, But … “

Q: I was “raised” Catholic, but in an (abusive) apostate household that did not allow me to become a proper Catholic. In 2006 I became a born-again Christian of the Assemblies of God denomination. I am mostly content as such. I am also married with two children. I sometimes contemplate conversion to Catholicism. However, I have a hard time understanding some doctrines. I have a hard time reconciling my experiences, when I was growing up, of being ostracized on account of my divorced parents. I also do not want to cause my children confusion or disrespect my husband. I also do not understand things like purgatory (Protestants don’t believe in it), the rosary, or Mariology (most Protestants respect Mary, however, they do not believe in “extra-biblical” accounts of her life). Infant “baptism” and the Eucharist also are viewed differently in Protestantism. Please give me some advice and how I might proceed. – J.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A:I am sorry to hear about your experience of having grown up in an abusive household. Especially lamentable is that you felt ostracized as a young person because of the divorce.

Yet, it seems as though the Holy Spirit is working in your heart now — and possibly leading you back to the Catholic Church.

In fact, because of your Catholic baptism you are still cherished as a beloved daughter of the Church. Hence, your return to the faith wouldn’t be a conversion to Catholicism, strictly speaking. You would simply be returning to the practice of the Catholic faith.

It is understandable that you didn’t mature well in the Catholic faith, given the troubled household. This is very sad, because ultimately the Catholic faith is about our relationship with Jesus, and no one should get in the way of our union with him.

Your living of the Catholic faith would not by nature cause disrespect toward a spouse. And because the Church guards the fullness of God’s revelation in Christ, it is meant to bring people, children included, into the fullness of the truth. At any rate your children would ultimately make their own decision about which faith to embrace.

True, there are some Catholic teachings that might be hard to accept. The faith is deep, and the connections between various points of Catholicism take time to detect and assimilate. But if you go deep enough, you will see how unified and coherent Church teachings are.

This unite and coherence is what enables the Church to publish its major teachings in a single-volume Catechism. That Catechism, one of the masterworks of modernity, also helps highlight the connection between what the Church teaches today and what was taught in antiquity.

As for specific topics such as purgatory, the rosary, Mariology, infant baptism and the Eucharist, there are reasonable explanations.

Purgatory is simply a place or a state that souls go through who die with unforgiven venial sin or with a debt of temporal punishment still owed on account of sin. A soul in mortal sin at death goes to hell, period. A soul with no sin and no temporal punishment left to pay, goes to heaven. There are probably few are in the latter category. Most of us who die without mortal sin are not perfect. We still need to be purified. Only pure souls can enter heaven.

Think of this way: When friend or loved ones die, we naturally pray for their soul, right? Now, if there is no purgatory, what purpose would our prayers serve? If their souls are in heaven, they doesn’t need our prayers. If they are in hell, our prayers won’t go them any good. But if they are in purgatory, then our prayers can help their souls get to heaven faster. For more reading on purgatory, you may find this article at Catholic Answers helpful.

As regards the rosary and Mariology: Mary certainly plays a big part in the life of Christ in Scripture. She is there at the annunciation, at his birth, at his finding in the temple, at his first miracle at Cana, at his death, and then she is there at Pentecost. This alone hints that she has a big part in the life of Jesus and of the start of the Church.

We pray to her as an intercessor, the same way your children might approach you if they want to get something out of Dad. They know that Dad won’t refuse Mom anything. In the same way we pray to Mary in part because we know she has a special intercessory power with her Son.

This devotion to Mary doesn’t detract from our worship of Jesus, for all authentic devotion leads us closer to her son Jesus. By the way, Mary predicted that all generations will call her blessed (see Luke 1:48). That is Scripture. Hence, Catholics have no problem calling her the Blessed Mother.

The rosary is just a way to help us contemplate the life of Jesus, in part through his relationship with Mary.

As for extra-biblical accounts of Mary’s life: The Church relies on both Scripture and Tradition (the oral transmission of teachings). Events such as the Assumption rely on Tradition, certainly. But then we relied on Tradition to give us Scripture; for before things were written down, they was handed down by word of mouth.

Infant baptism was allowed in the early Church, and Scripture itself hints at it. Think of it this way: Parents want to give their children the best, so why not baptism? Baptism takes away original sin and gives a baby the gift of sanctifying grace. This is fitting, since babies need to be saved like anyone else; they also need the salvific help of Jesus. They inherit original sin like the rest of us. Again, Catholic Answers has a helpful article on baptism.

As for the Eucharist: Jesus himself says, “This is my body … this is my blood.” He wasn’t speaking symbolically. We know this from John 6:22-71. Jesus said he would give his flesh to eat, and this repulsed many people. When they were leaving, he didn’t stop them and say, “I was just speaking symbolically.” No, he stood by his words – and he even challenged the apostles to leave.

Try reading the text without any preconceived ideas. Jesus meant to give us his body and blood. Catholics hold that he does this sacramentally, under the signs of bread and wine, in the Eucharist. This is not cannibalism, however. It is a partaking of the Lamb of God, sacrificed for our redemption, but in an unbloody way.

For now, perhaps you want to take all this to prayer and see where the Holy Spirit is leading. And try reading the Catechism or its Compendium.

There is also a series of books with testimonies from people who came into the Catholic Church from various backgrounds; these books might be of great interest to you as you continue striving to respond to what God is doing in your heart. They are called “Surprised by Truth”.

Don’t be afraid. Our Lord only wants the best for you and your loved ones.

“Ask a Priest: I Feel Drawn Back to the Church, But … “ Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What to Do About a Friend Who Has Been Abused and Cheated On?

Q: I have been dating my girlfriend on and off for three years. Problems arise because she has had a traumatic past. She was cheated on and divorced her husband whom she had known since grade school, had an abortion and was molested as a child. As Catholics we are taught not to judge. My initial thought process was to show her love and kindness, which I did. Everything was great, but little by little, things got worse. I talked to her about how much God loves her and that she should go to confession and talk to a priest about her abortion. She resisted and made the comment basically saying the abortion was the right choice. With my job I have to travel quite a bit and always have trouble getting my work done because she has severe insecurity because of her husband cheating on her. Lastly, she keeps saying that she will never forgive God for allowing her to be molested as a child. I don’t know what to do, Father. One of my concerns is if we would be allowed to be married in the Catholic Church. The biggest concern is that I want to raise a family in a loving Christian home, and I am concerned that she will hold onto this anger for God. I try to show her more love and kindness, but the harder I try, the worse it gets. – S.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: I am very sorry to hear about your friend. It sounds as though she indeed has many deep-seated problems. There are a number of points to be considered.

First, she probably needs intensive counseling to help her overcome her horrific past. The abuse was lamentable. It is sad but understandable that it affected her view of God, even though Our Lord wasn’t to blame.

Second, she needs psychological as well as spiritual help for overcoming the trauma of the abortion. The problem, of course, is that she doesn’t seem to view the abortion as the moral evil it was.

This leads to a third point. You need to be realistic about how much you can help her change. Views on abortion can be very hard to change, especially if someone shows reluctance to rethink the issue.

Also, the problems with trust are deeply ingrained, too — another level of complication.

Then there is the matter of an annulment. Let me say for the record that the Church presumes that her marriage is still valid, unless and until it is shown to be otherwise. So you need to ask yourself whether it is prudent to be close to someone who is still married in the eyes of the Church.

Even with an annulment, it is not clear whether a marriage between you and her would be sanctioned, given your friend’s many traumas.

I don’t mean this in a judgmental way. God alone knows the suffering that your friend has gone through and how this has affected her way of thinking. Still, there are objective evils that need to be dealt with — the abortion, the childhood abuse, the marital infidelity. All these have left deep wounds in her. How much those wounds can be healed is hard to say.

All of this calls for a lot of prudence on your side. It is admirable that you are trying to help her. But without her cooperation your help can only go so far.

For now it might be good to intensify your prayer for her, and encourage her to seek counseling with a solid Catholic therapist (you might find one at http://www.catholictherapists.com/find-a-therapist).

If she resists counseling or going to confession, perhaps you could encourage her to attend a Rachel’s Vineyard retreat. And don’t be afraid to put some distance between you and her if you think that might be the only way to encourage her to get the help she really needs.

For yourself it would help to find a regular confessor or spiritual director who could guide you. You need someone who can give you an objective viewpoint. I hope some of this helps. Count on my prayers for you and your friend.

“Ask a Priest: What to Do About a Friend Who Has Been Abused and Cheated On? Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Do I Need to Accept My Mom’s Boyfriend?”

Q: I have a question regarding my mom’s current relationship. I am married myself. My mom and dad had been married for 28 years until they separated last November. They had had a very up-and-down relationship for years. I had witnessed accounts of abuse on both sides. Both of my parents have hot tempers. During the separation, my mom would call me often and cry and I would console her. This went on for months. They became officially divorced as of August 1. My mom told me that she had not intended for it, but that she had met a man whom she liked. She told me that they had been friends and that she had developed feelings for him. Their relationship has been moving very fast with my mom spending hours each day on the phone with him, spending the entire last two weekends with him, spending nights at his house, etc. She has told me that she wants to act “normal” with him, and to start spending time with her kids (me and my siblings), and she wants him to come over to our house and to play cards/games which is what we used to do with my dad when they were together. I feel very uncomfortable spending time with him because I feel in my heart that they have moved way too fast and that it is wrong. Also, I feel that it is all wrong because my mom and dad have not gotten an annulment yet. I tried to convey my concerns to her. She has told me that I am not honoring the Fourth Commandment because I will not meet him and for implying to her that she is committing adultery. In this situation, am I not honoring my mother and committing a mortal sin myself? — N.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: I am sorry to hear about your parents’ breakup and the heartache it must cause the family. From what you describe, it seems that you are on the right side of issues.

Honoring one’s parent doesn’t mean turning a blind eye to his or her moral behavior. I don’t mean that in a judgmental way. It’s just that, as you mention, without an annulment your parents are still considered married in the eyes of the Church, and therefore they need to conduct themselves accordingly. Mom seems to be scandalizing you by spending nights at her friend’s house.

Objectively, to accept your mom and her friend as a couple would be tantamount to a show of support for their relationship, which seems inappropriate at this point, given the lack of an annulment.

Moreover, what if an annulment is never granted? Not every failed marriage is an invalid marriage.

The best way you can truly honor your mom is to be charitable, pray for her, and to witness to the fullness of your faith — meaning that you act as though the marriage of your parents is still valid. This is a way you can also pay honor to your dad — remember, he deserves some respect, too.

“Ask a Priest: Do I Need to Accept My Mom’s Boyfriend?” Read More »

Scroll to Top

Events

Looking for another country?

Contact Regnum Christi near you

News & Resources

News & Resources

The Regnum Christi Mission

The Regnum Christi Identity

Alex Kucera

Atlanta

Alex Kucera has lived in Atlanta, GA, for the last 46 years. He is one of 9 children, married to his wife Karmen, and has 3 girls, one grandson, and a granddaughter on the way. Alex joined Regnum Christi in 2007. Out of the gate, he joined the Helping Hands Medical Missions apostolate and is still participating today with the Ghana Friendship Mission.

In 2009, Alex was asked to be the Atlanta RC Renewal Coordinator for the Atlanta Locality to help the RC members with the RC renewal process. Alex became a Group Leader in 2012 for four of the Atlanta Men’s Section Teams and continues today. Running in parallel, in 2013, Alex became a Team Leader and shepherded a large team of good men.

Alex was honored to be the Atlanta Mission Coordinator between 2010 to 2022 (12 years), coordinating 5-8 Holy Week Mission teams across Georgia. He also created and coordinated missions at a parish in Athens, GA, for 9 years. Alex continues to coordinate Holy Week Missions, Advent Missions, and Monthly missions at Good Shepherd Catholic Church in Cumming, GA.

From 2016 to 2022, Alex also served as the Men’s Section Assistant in Atlanta. He loved working with the Men’s Section Director, the Legionaries, Consecrated, and Women’s Section leadership teams.

Alex is exceptionally grateful to the Legionaries, Consecrated, and many RC members who he’s journeyed shoulder to shoulder, growing his relationship with Christ and others along the way. He knows that there is only one way, that’s Christ’s Way, with others!