May 30, 2023

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What If a Dream Involves Something Normally Sinful?

Q: If a person is having dreams about sinning against the Ten Commandments like mortal sins but he does not wish them, what does it mean? I ask this because I have been experiencing this off and on, and I wake up feeling shame and guilt. I have felt many times to not receive the Eucharist because of the severity of the dream and so I missed daily Mass. I now know that is wrong. What do you recommend besides discussing it in confession and spiritual direction? A priest told me temptations and dreams don’t need to be confessed – but what if they lead you to sin? What should I do? -P.B.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: It takes a delicate conscience to refrain from receiving the Eucharist when one thinks he has fallen into grave sin. So your heart seems to be in the right place.

First, let’s recall that someone in mortal sin should refrain from receiving the Eucharist. Mortal sin requires three conditions: 1) the object is grave, or serious, matter; 2) the sin is committed with full knowledge; and 3) it is done with deliberate consent (see Catechism, 1857). A person in mortal sin should try to get to confession as soon as possible.

Now, when we are asleep and dreaming we are not in full control of our will. Physiological factors such as stress or bad diet or lack of exercise could have a lot of effect on what we experience in dreams. Deliberate consent assumes that we are conscious (or substantially conscious) and aware of what is happening around us.

Gray areas can abound here. States of semiconsciousness (such as when we drift in and out of sleep) will affect the level of awareness we have of things. When a line is or isn’t crossed, is not always easy to distinguish. As a rule of thumb we could say this: A person who habitually resists certain temptations when fully awake can probably give himself the benefit of the doubt when a temptation occurs in a dream or in a state of semiconsciousness. In such a case one need not refrain from receiving Communion. In any case a person can always attend daily Mass.

You mention about confession. True, we don’t need to confess temptations and dreams. What could be matter for confession, though, is the things we do that bring on temptations. Let’s explain this point. We need to guard our senses — that is, we need to be careful about what we look at and listen to during the day. If we are careless about what we watch on TV or the Internet; if we fail to guard our gaze around the magazine rack at the checkout line; or if we listen to music with provocative lyrics — we might put ourselves in an immediate occasion of sin. Later, those bad images or lyrics could trigger memories and temptations. While these later temptations in and of themselves are not sinful, the negligence that brought them on could be considered material for confession.

Now a penitent could choose to mention temptations in confession. Someone might find comfort in speaking about a particular or ongoing temptation, because it helps them to share what they are going through. This could also give the priest a broader view of the penitent’s state of soul. But again, the mentioning of temptations is optional.

Your reference to confession and spiritual direction indicates that you are serious about your relationship with God. Keep taking advantage of these means of grace (and having a regular confessor who knows you well can be a plus). Consciously renounce temptations. Also keep working on positive points: prayer, physical exercise, balanced ascetical practices (such as being moderate in the use of food and drink), a healthy social life, and regular recourse to the Eucharist and the sacrament of penance. Stay close to the Blessed Virgin Mary too; she is a great interceder in heaven.

“Ask a Priest: What If a Dream Involves Something Normally Sinful? Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Are Stand-Your-Ground Laws Morally OK?”

Q: Can you help me understand the Church’s position on stand-your-ground laws? Is it for or against, or is it nuanced? With recent news of different shootings, it seems salient. I think previously there were self-defense laws, which the Church would be OK with to a certain extent, but stand-your-ground laws seem to take it a step further. It doesn’t seem correct somehow that a person can shoot another person for feeling threatened even by their mere presence. In the bigger picture, how does the U.S. Church square its relatively neutral stance (as far as I can perceive) on laws loosening gun restrictions and making it easier for someone to kill someone else lawfully, with its outspoken advocacy against abortion? Could it hold for a mother to have an abortion if she feels her life is in danger from a pregnancy due to actual or potential health complications? – M.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: The Church has articulated basic principles to guide us in the use of deadly force.

Deadly force can be justified under the principle of double effect if it’s the only way to stop an unjust aggressor.

A few numbers from the Catechism are worth quoting here:

Legitimate defense

2263 The legitimate defense of persons and societies is not an exception to the prohibition against the murder of the innocent that constitutes intentional killing. “The act of self-defense can have a double effect: the preservation of one’s own life; and the killing of the aggressor…. The one is intended, the other is not.”

2264 Love toward oneself remains a fundamental principle of morality. Therefore it is legitimate to insist on respect for one’s own right to life. Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow:

If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful…. Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one’s own life than of another’s.

2265 Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for someone responsible for another’s life. Preserving the common good requires rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm. To this end, those holding legitimate authority have the right to repel by armed force aggressors against the civil community entrusted to their charge. [end quoted material]

As regards the stand-your-ground laws: It would be necessary to see the details of each law to offer a detailed evaluation. Shooting someone who happens to stray into your back yard, for instance, wouldn’t be justified under the principles mentioned in the Catechism.

Nevertheless, people do have a right to protect themselves and their families. How they do it and to what extent that involves having guns around is a prudential decision as well as a political decision.

Whether the Church would make official statements on this or that law depends on each case.

While a local bishop might make suggestions, the Church generally won’t get involved in every legislative debate. The Church recognizes that civil authority has a certain autonomy, and certain issues are for public officials to decide.

In any case, the issue of guns isn’t quite on the same level as abortion. Guns aren’t inherently evil. They can be used for good purposes (hunting or legitimate defense) or bad purposes (unjust aggression). Abortion, on the other hand, is always evil because it involves the deliberate killing of an innocent life.

A basic moral principle is that we can’t use evil means to obtain a good end. Hence, abortion is never allowed. A mother whose health is in danger needs proper medical care, and an abortion is never medical care in the true sense.

If we allow an evil means for a good end, then anything could be justified — which would be the end of morality and any chance for civil society.

For a deeper look at the Catholic view of the political realm, see the Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church, Chapter 8.

 

“Ask a Priest: Are Stand-Your-Ground Laws Morally OK?” Read More »

Scroll to Top

Events

Looking for another country?

Contact Regnum Christi near you

News & Resources

News & Resources

The Regnum Christi Mission

The Regnum Christi Identity

Alex Kucera

Atlanta

Alex Kucera has lived in Atlanta, GA, for the last 46 years. He is one of 9 children, married to his wife Karmen, and has 3 girls, one grandson, and a granddaughter on the way. Alex joined Regnum Christi in 2007. Out of the gate, he joined the Helping Hands Medical Missions apostolate and is still participating today with the Ghana Friendship Mission.

In 2009, Alex was asked to be the Atlanta RC Renewal Coordinator for the Atlanta Locality to help the RC members with the RC renewal process. Alex became a Group Leader in 2012 for four of the Atlanta Men’s Section Teams and continues today. Running in parallel, in 2013, Alex became a Team Leader and shepherded a large team of good men.

Alex was honored to be the Atlanta Mission Coordinator between 2010 to 2022 (12 years), coordinating 5-8 Holy Week Mission teams across Georgia. He also created and coordinated missions at a parish in Athens, GA, for 9 years. Alex continues to coordinate Holy Week Missions, Advent Missions, and Monthly missions at Good Shepherd Catholic Church in Cumming, GA.

From 2016 to 2022, Alex also served as the Men’s Section Assistant in Atlanta. He loved working with the Men’s Section Director, the Legionaries, Consecrated, and Women’s Section leadership teams.

Alex is exceptionally grateful to the Legionaries, Consecrated, and many RC members who he’s journeyed shoulder to shoulder, growing his relationship with Christ and others along the way. He knows that there is only one way, that’s Christ’s Way, with others!