heresy

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Uncle Eddy

St Celestine I

Dear Steve,

For once, I am glad you are thousands of miles away.  Otherwise, I may have strangled you in a fit of rage after reading your last email.  Theological “dissent” is NOT a service to the Church and never has been, no matter what your “amiable and brilliant” young professor tells you.  Dissent creates confusion – temptation’s favorite weapon.  I don’t have time to go into the fallacies of the Theology of Dissent right now (I am being taken to the interrogation room again in 5 minutes).  I hope it’s sufficient to remind you that forcing every Church teaching to pass the test of your personal opinions (which boil down to your personal TASTES) is tantamount to claiming that you are the Pope.  If you really believe that, than you ought to be coherent and join a Protestant church.  But I don’t think you really do believe that – at least, I hope not.  A glance at today’s saint may help refresh your understanding of the Papacy.

Celestine I was a native Roman, and succeeded Boniface to the Papacy.  This was in the year 422.  At that point the Papacy had already survived for four hundred years as God’s guarantor of Church unity and authentic doctrine.  During Celestine’s ten years as Pope, he was busy parrying horrible threats to both.  There was a promising young priest in Numidia (Africa – part of modern Algeria’s coast) who became corrupt soon after being named bishop of Fussala.  He was creating quite a scandal, and even succeeded in evading discipline by terrorizing his populace.  St Austin alerted Celestine to the danger, and the Pope quelled the disturbance prudently and efficiently.

He also had to face three different outbreaks of heresy.  Nestorianism (which claims that there were two persons in Christ – a divine person and a human person… it’s a blunder that seems nitpicky at first, but has terrible consequences if taken to its logical extreme) flared up in Asia Minor (Turkey), and Celestine had to call an Ecumenical Council at Ephesus to put it out.  He had to rein in some overzealous bishops in Gaul, and he had to send St Germanus of Auxerre to stifle the Pelagianism threatening England.

For the ten years of his Papacy, Celestine used his divinely appointed, universal authority in matters of faith and morals to keep the Catholic Church united and faithful to Christ.  That, my bright young nephew, is what the Papacy is for.  Therefore, if you start putting your considerable intellectual talent in opposition to Church teaching instead of at its service, you are playing a dangerous (and stupid) game.

Your faithful uncle,

Eddy

St Celestine I Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Was Aquinas’ Summa Theologica Considered Heresy?”

Q: I am going through RCIA and am not great at defending the faith yet. I just had an interesting conversation with a Baptist who told me that the Catholic Church routinely condemns people to hell. This did not seem right to me, and I was under the impression that the Church teaches that, although there are people who go to hell, the only one that we can be certain of is Lucifer. If I am wrong, I apologize. He also claimed that the Summa Theologica was considered heresy by the Church for a few hundred years and then finally accepted. As a fan of St. Thomas Aquinas, this also struck me as odd. The Baptist also had a lot to say about the Catholic Church not being the historical Church and the Bible not being accurate. If you have any resources you can direct me to on these issues I would very much appreciate it. – T.S.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: It’s good to hear that you are in the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults. Don’t feel bad if you aren’t up to speed defending the faith. The art of apologetics, or reasoned defense of the faith, takes time to development.

Let’s turn to the points you raise.

First, the Church doesn’t condemn anyone. God alone is the judge of a soul. And if a soul rejects God through mortal sin and dies in that state, the person faces eternal damnation.

For instance, Jesus says of those who ignored the demand of charity: “Depart from me, you accursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels” (Matthew 25:41).

The Church doesn’t say that any specific person is lost, not even Judas, who betrayed Jesus.

The comment about the Summa Theologica (also called the Summa Theologiae) is unfounded.

The Baptist might be thinking of the Condemnation of 1277 by the bishop of Paris, Stephen Tempier. His condemnation targeted 219 philosophical and theological theses being debated within his jurisdiction. Though St. Thomas Aquinas was not named, the condemnation was evidently aimed at some of his ideas.

Now, opinions in regard to philosophical and theological issues can shift and evolve. The upshot is that Thomas Aquinas’ name was eventually cleared, and he was canonized a saint in 1323.

And if canonization wasn’t enough to restore Thomas’ good name, Pope Leo XIII in his 1879 encyclical Aeterni Patris aimed to revive Scholastic philosophy, according to the mind of the Angelic Doctor. This cemented the works of St. Thomas as a key point of guidance for many seminaries and theologians.

As for resources about the Catholic Church as the Church founded by Jesus, you might check out:

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/one-holy-baptist-and-apostolic-church

https://www.catholic.com/tract/apostolic-succession

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-church-of-the-apostles

https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/the-church-christ-founded

As for “the Bible not being accurate,” I’m not sure what your Baptist friend has in mind.

The Bible is a complex anthology of books with various styles of writing that need to be understood in context.

Like any text, the Bible has to be interpreted correctly. We rely on Sacred Tradition, the oral teaching of Christ and the apostles passed down through the ages, to help us here.

A document that touches on Scripture within the context of Divine Revelation is Dei Verbum. Also helpful: https://opusdei.org/en-us/article/what-sort-of-historical-credibility-does-the-bible-have/.

In any case, the Bible is the inspired word of God. What is in it, is there because God wanted it there. I hope some of this helps.

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: Was Aquinas’ Summa Theologica Considered Heresy?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Why Condemn Origen Along With His Writings?”

Q: As part of a college course I have recently started reading about Origen, one of the early Christian theologians. I read that he was condemned by the Catholic Church for holding heretical beliefs but that some of his writings were considered canon. How is this? Furthermore, what does it mean to be condemned or “anathematized” by the Church? Is it the same as being excommunicated? Why couldn’t Origen’s writings just be condemned? I understand that we must fight against heresy, but what about being merciful and forgiving toward the person? Do I have to condemn/curse him too? – J.N.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: Two words need to be clarified here, namely, “condemned” and “canon.”

The word condemn in this context can easily be misinterpreted. The Church can condemn a work for its faulty ideas, as a way to warn people about its doctrinal mistakes.

The Church might also “anathematize,” or excommunicate, a person for holding on to seriously wrong ideas, since embracing such heresy puts his soul at risk. Excommunication, however, doesn’t mean the Church is sentencing a soul to perdition. The Church cannot do that. God alone is the judge of a soul.

In the case of Origen some of his later ideas weren’t acceptable to the Church and thus were condemned. This doesn’t mean that all of his writings were condemned. In fact, he is still studied as an important early Christian writer.

Pope Benedict XVI is something of a supporter of many of Origen’s (good) ideas. You can see from his general audience talks HERE and also HERE.

The other word is canon. “Canon” is usually applied to the list of books recognized as divinely inspired and include in Scripture. “Canon” in regard to early Christian writings has a looser meaning. These writings aren’t considered inspired in the same sense as biblical texts are, though they might have great value for understanding the mind and practices of the early Church. Some of Origin’s works fulfill those criteria.

By the way, the notions of the condemnation of writings and the excommunication of people are acts of charity, for two reasons.

First, it alerts others that certain writings have serious errors and should not be treated as real doctrine. This is part of the Church’s mission to teach the Gospel — a great act of charity.

Second, it sends a strong signal to a writer, if he is still living, that he needs to dissociate himself from certain faulty ideas, in part for the good of his own soul. This, too, is charity in the deep sense.

To allow someone to stay stuck in grave mistake is not an act of mercy but one of neglect or indifference.

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: Why Condemn Origen Along With His Writings?” Read More »

Scroll to Top

Looking for another country?

RC Near You

News & Resources

News & Resources

The Regnum Christi Mission

The Regnum Christi Identity

Alex Kucera

Atlanta

Alex Kucera has lived in Atlanta, GA, for the last 46 years. He is one of 9 children, married to his wife Karmen, and has 3 girls, one grandson, and a granddaughter on the way. Alex joined Regnum Christi in 2007. Out of the gate, he joined the Helping Hands Medical Missions apostolate and is still participating today with the Ghana Friendship Mission.

In 2009, Alex was asked to be the Atlanta RC Renewal Coordinator for the Atlanta Locality to help the RC members with the RC renewal process. Alex became a Group Leader in 2012 for four of the Atlanta Men’s Section Teams and continues today. Running in parallel, in 2013, Alex became a Team Leader and shepherded a large team of good men.

Alex was honored to be the Atlanta Mission Coordinator between 2010 to 2022 (12 years), coordinating 5-8 Holy Week Mission teams across Georgia. He also created and coordinated missions at a parish in Athens, GA, for 9 years. Alex continues to coordinate Holy Week Missions, Advent Missions, and Monthly missions at Good Shepherd Catholic Church in Cumming, GA.

From 2016 to 2022, Alex also served as the Men’s Section Assistant in Atlanta. He loved working with the Men’s Section Director, the Legionaries, Consecrated, and Women’s Section leadership teams.

Alex is exceptionally grateful to the Legionaries, Consecrated, and many RC members who he’s journeyed shoulder to shoulder, growing his relationship with Christ and others along the way. He knows that there is only one way, that’s Christ’s Way, with others!