Gospel

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: How Can I Evangelize?”

Q: Is it a mortal sin not to preach the Gospel and evangelize? What is the definition of evangelization, and what are examples? – I.F.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: We need to distinguish here.

If we don’t preach the Gospel in a certain moment — for instance, to a wayward relative who happens to be visiting briefly — that might be a venial sin.

But if we go month after month, year after year, without sharing the Gospel with others, there could be a serious sin of omission.

In a particular situation it might be hard to draw a line between venial and mortal sin. God alone knows the heart of a person.

Suffice it to say that evangelization of some kind should be a part of every Catholic’s life.

What is evangelization? Let’s take a sentence from a U.S. bishops’ conference statement:

“We can rephrase his [Pope Paul VI’s] words to say that evangelizing means bringing the Good News of Jesus into every human situation and seeking to convert individuals and society by the divine power of the Gospel itself. At its essence are the proclamation of salvation in Jesus Christ and the response of a person in faith, which are both works of the Spirit of God.”

A rich read is Paul VI’s 1975 exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi.

Examples of evangelization could be:

— Making time for prayer with your family at meals and other times of the day.

— Speaking with family members and friends about the words of Christ and the teachings of the Church.

— Speaking with family members and friends about the words of Christ and the teachings of the Church.

— Getting involving in teaching CCD or doing door-to-door missions in one’s parish.

— Starting a Bible study circle or gathering a group to delve into the theology of the body.

— Supporting overseas missions with your prayers and financial donations.

— Witnessing to your faith in our neighborhood and workplace through your example, your conversations, the things your wear (crosses) or have on our desk (crucifix or picture of a saint) etc.

For more ideas, see my colleague Father Bartunek’s book, Go! 30 Meditations on How to Best Love Your Neighbor as Yourself.

Whatever your state in life, let yourself be guided by the words of 1 Corinthians 9:16 – “If I preach the gospel, this is no reason for me to boast, for an obligation has been imposed on me, and woe to me if I do not preach it!”

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: How Can I Evangelize?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What About Those Gifts of the Magi?”

Q: Did the magi in the Gospel really give gold, frankincense and myrrh to the Christ Child, and what would they have done with it? – S.B.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: The Gospel says what it says. The gifts would have been especially fitting.

Gold is a gift for a king (in this case the newborn King of Kings). Frankincense is tied to worship of God (the rising smoke symbolizes our prayers going up to the Almighty). Myrrh is an ointment used, among other things, for burial (and thus foreshadows Jesus’ sacrificial death).

One could imagine that these gifts would have been a timely and practical help for the Holy Family.

Perhaps Joseph sold or bartered the gifts in order to pay for the emergency flight into Egypt. “They” – I’ll assume you mean the Holy Family — would have needed resources quickly to enable them to go into exile and care for the Child.

In that case, the gift of the magi would have both served a symbolic function and met a practical need.

To go deeper in the meaning of the biblical passage of the magi, you might want to watch Starlight: An Advent Retreat Guide on the Three Wise Men.

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: What About Those Gifts of the Magi?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What If Everything Seems Pointless?”

Q: I’ve been very upset for a while because I know that once we die and go to heaven all earthly ways are left behind, and none of it will exist in heaven and Scripture tells us to set our minds on things above and not earthly things. So now I don’t really enjoy anything I do, and everything seems pointless because ultimately it won’t matter in heaven. So all the things and activities that I previously enjoyed and the idea of marriage just kind of lost their appeal or enjoyment. I find no joy in being a Christian anymore. I feel really disappointed and depressed like all the time. – J.K.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: If you are feeling disappointed and depressed all the time, that might be a symptom of something else going on in your life.

Disappointment and depression are not the normal states of a Christian. Being a Christian, in fact, should give us a deep-rooted joy. After all, we have faith in Jesus, we know what he has done for us, and we understand what life is about. It lifts our gaze toward the hope of eternal life.

I would qualify that notion that “everything seems pointless.” True, the things of this world will pass away. But that doesn’t mean they are pointless.

Rather, this world as a kind of test run for eternity. What we do or don’t do here will have a huge impact on our eternity.

In this world we have the chance to pray, to sacrifice for souls, to spread the Gospel, to help other people get closer to Jesus, and to help them on their way to heaven. In this world we have the chance to become saints or to turn into tyrants.

In this sense the things of this world, including the opportunities they give us to grow in the virtues, are not pointless.

Moreover, Jesus himself doesn’t want us to just hide away in a cave. Here it might be good to read the parable in Matthew 25:14-30 and to note what happens to the servant with the one talent.

None of this implies that we should become attached to the world. St. Paul expressed the ambivalence of being a Christian nicely: “I am caught between the two. I long to depart this life and be with Christ, [for] that is far better. Yet that I remain [in] the flesh is more necessary for your benefit. And this I know with confidence, that I shall remain and continue in the service of all of you for your progress and joy in the faith” (Philippians 1:23-25).

There we have a nice summary of what a Christian might feel: a desire to leave this world behind and be with Jesus, and yet a tug in the other direction, to stay here and help other souls to grow in their faith.

(For more reading see my colleague Father Bartunek’s Seeking First the Kingdom.)

Be sure of this: You have a mission in life. Jesus didn’t put you here just to wait for the day when you leave this world. He wants you to jump into the arena, to use your talents for the glory of God and the good of others, and to bring his love to the souls you meet.

Living this mission to the full will allow you to begin to experience the joy of eternal life even while you are still here on earth — in fact, that’s why Jesus came to be our Savior: “I came that they might have life and have it more abundantly” (John 10:10).

The deeper our friendship with Jesus gets here on earth, the more we experience the lasting happiness that he wants us to experience. Jesus himself designed human life; living it according to his example and teaching leads us to experience more fulfillment in life, not less.

Perhaps it might help to pray about this point and seek out a confessor or spiritual director to guide you. And if that sense of depression lingers, you might consider seeing a counselor, too.

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: What If Everything Seems Pointless?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Does Everyone Really Have a Right to the Sacraments?”

Q: I recently participated in a ministry workshop at my parish when the priest said that “everybody” has the right to the sacraments; I inquired about the story narrated on the article attached and he reaffirmed “everybody has the right to the Sacraments.” [Editor’s note: The attached article spoke of a priest who denied someone Communion at a relative’s funeral because the priest read in an obituary that the man was living in a same-sex union. The article said that local bishops did not support the priest but rather apologized to the man.] I am confused between what I read in the article that I’m attaching and what the priest at my parish said. Could you tell me where is the truth on this topic and its corresponding support in the Catechism and the Gospel? – G.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: Sometimes the word “right” is used in a very loose way when it comes to the sacraments.

The Catechism in No. 1269 says, in part, “Just as Baptism is the source of responsibilities and duties, the baptized person also enjoys rights within the Church: to receive the sacraments, to be nourished with the Word of God and to be sustained by the other spiritual helps of the Church.”

While there is a stated right to the sacraments, the Catechism in No. 1131 says of the sacraments, “They bear fruit in those who receive them with the required dispositions” [italics mine].

“Required dispositions” in the case of the Eucharist means that a person should be in a state of grace, that is, not knowingly have any mortal sins. To receive Communion in a state of mortal sin would be a sacrilege. St. Paul warns as much in this passage: “Whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord unworthily will have to answer for the body and blood of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 11:27).

So the phrase “right to the sacraments” has to be understood in context. A teenager with little or no religious instruction, for instance, cannot get in line at a confirmation Mass and present himself to the bishop for anointing. A cohabiting couple couldn’t simply show one Saturday afternoon at the parish and demand their “right” to marry.

Now, distribution of Communion is a delicate business. Normally it is up to each person to examine his conscience as to whether he is worthy to receive. The middle of Mass is normally not the time nor the place for battles with a minister.

I won’t try to second-guess any bishops here, for the simple fact that: 1) I don’t know all the facts, and 2) bishops have the authority to intervene in these cases. There might be lots of reasons why it is not opportune for tensions to be raised in a Communion line at a funeral Mass.

Suffice it to say, then, that the right to a sacrament is always conditional, and usually the onus is on the person who presents himself for a sacrament.

Pastorally, I would avoid using the phrase “Everyone has a right the sacraments” since it can be easily misunderstood.

Normally, in the case of someone who appears to be in an irregular situation, it is usually up to the pastor to decide how to handle things. He might choose to approach a person discreetly and explain Church teaching about norms about receiving Communion. If it involves a high-profile person, such as a politician, this kind of thing might be best left for the bishop to decide.

One important clarification is needed here: A minister never knows the state of a person’s soul. God alone knows the heart and soul of a person. This distinction is crucial to understanding why a minister will normally not refuse Communion to someone in line at Mass.

Keep learning more with Ask a Priest

Got a question? Need an answer?

Today’s secular world throws curve balls at us all the time. AskACatholicPriest is a Q&A feature that anyone can use. Just type in your question or send an email to [email protected] and you will get a personal response back from one of our priests at RCSpirituality. You can ask about anything – liturgy, prayer, moral questions, current events… Our goal is simply to provide a trustworthy forum for dependable Catholic guidance and information. So go ahead and ask your question…

“Ask a Priest: Does Everyone Really Have a Right to the Sacraments?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: What Should We Make of Ancient Faiths?”

Q: We now have a decent understanding of ancient civilizations, and with that understanding comes knowledge of their religious practices. I would like to know how these ancient faiths are viewed in Catholicism. These religions were generated before Christ, and many before Judaism, and they had thousands if not millions of devout followers. Also, many were polytheistic, so any indication that they were perhaps worshipping the same God that we worship today is destroyed because they worshipped many gods. One thing that hit me especially hard was learning about how ancient Mayans used to compete in their sport, and the winner of these games would be allowed to be the individual who was sacrificed. This hit me hard because it showed me just how devout these individuals were to their faith, and obviously the glory of our God had nothing to do with their devotion. So, in God’s eyes, what were these people doing? And what makes Catholicism so much more legitimate than their faiths? It seems their belief was just as strong as most Catholics; was God simply happy to be idle until revealing the truth around the time of Moses and thereafter? – J.R.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: You raise big questions! A proper answer would require a book-length e-mail. But perhaps a few observations could help here. Let me try to address some of your specific questions.

— I would like to know how these ancient faiths are viewed in Catholicism?

Let me preface my observation with a very quick overview of salvation history.

After the fall in the Garden of Eden, God promised a redeemer (see Genesis 3:15. God in his wisdom didn’t send the redeemer right away; in fact, the world had to wait a long time for the coming of Christ.

One theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, likened this delay to the case of a patient battling an illness. Sometimes medicine can’t be given to a sick person right away. It takes time for an illness to run its course, before the medicine can be effective. The same could be said of the world. It had to let the illness of sin runs its course for a while before the cure (Jesus) could be administered.

Now, man, who is made in the image of God, always looks for something transcendent. He looks for ways to understand what life is about. He looks for ways to connect with a deity that he intuits is “up there somewhere.”

Hence, various cultures and peoples who didn’t know about Christ or the Triune God developed ways of searching for the transcendent, of giving what they believed was glory to the deity or deities they believed in. In other words, they groped in the darkness. But at least they were searching for something.

So what does the Church think about these ancient religions? It recognizes that there were probably sparks of the truth in them. But it also holds that the fullness of truth was revealed in Jesus Christ. (For more reading see the declaration “Dominus Iesus“.

How will God judge peoples who practiced those ancient faiths? He will certainly judge them differently (that is, less strictly) than he will judge those of us who should know better.

Permit me to quote at length a passage from the Second Vatican Council document on the Church, Lumen Gentium, No 16:

“Finally, those who have not yet received the Gospel are related in various ways to the people of God. In the first place we must recall the people to whom the testament and the promises were given and from whom Christ was born according to the flesh. On account of their fathers this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts He makes nor of the calls He issues. But the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God, who on the last day will judge mankind. Nor is God far distant from those who in shadows and images seek the unknown God, for it is He who gives to all men life and breath and all things, and as Savior wills that all men be saved. Those also can attain to salvation who through no fault of their own do not know the Gospel of Christ or His Church, yet sincerely seek God and moved by grace strive by their deeds to do His will as it is known to them through the dictates of conscience. Nor does Divine Providence deny the helps necessary for salvation to those who, without blame on their part, have not yet arrived at an explicit knowledge of God and with His grace strive to live a good life. Whatever good or truth is found among them is looked upon by the Church as a preparation for the Gospel. She knows that it is given by Him who enlightens all men so that they may finally have life. But often men, deceived by the Evil One, have become vain in their reasonings and have exchanged the truth of God for a lie, serving the creature rather than the Creator.”

— So, in God’s eyes, what were these people doing? And what makes Catholicism so much more legitimate than their faiths? It seems their belief was just as strong as most Catholics, was God simply happy to be idle until revealing the truth around the time of Moses and thereafter?

As mentioned, God probably recognized that these ancient peoples were trying to express some kind of worship to some kind of deity. Religion comes naturally to people; we are built to reach out to the infinite.

Why is Catholicism more legitimate? Because the Church is founded by Jesus Christ, the Son of God who took on human nature and walked among us. Our beliefs are what Jesus taught. Jesus is the height of God’s revelation in the world.

The fact that ancient people felt strongly about their faith — maybe even more strongly than some Christians feel about their faith — might speak to the sincerity of these folks. But intensity of belief is a separate issue from whether someone actually has the truth. Today, for instance, there are terrorists who believe strongly that their faith allows and encourages them to kill innocent people. The intensity of their belief doesn’t make their ideas true.

As for God’s timing, yes, there is something mysterious about it. It is kind of remarkable that he started to reveal himself more intensely to individuals and peoples in very specific locations in the Middle East, at very specific times of history. But then, Jesus entered the world in a specific time and place, too. The meaning of his Incarnation and what it means for us is the kind of topic that could fill a small library with books. As for the ancients who didn’t know of Jesus or of the God of Israel, suffice is to say that somehow the Almighty gave them assistance in their journey through life.

What is the upshot of all this? We could say that our faith, our baptism, our knowledge of Jesus Christ is a great grace. Not everyone has had that grace. And that means that God will expect more from us who know of Jesus. He will hold us to a high standard at Judgment Day.

“Ask a Priest: What Should We Make of Ancient Faiths?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Did the Devil Know Who Jesus Was?”

Q: Ever since I have started reading the Bible again there are plenty of questions that keep popping up. For example, did Satan know who Jesus was when he was tempting him? What exactly did Jesus mean in Matthew 7:6? John the Baptist came to prepare the way for Jesus and was involved in baptizing Jesus; and he didn’t want to do so, saying he was not worthy. Why then did John send out his disciples to find out if Jesus was who he thought he was? Was John confused? And until Jesus was told, did he not know that John the Baptist was beheaded? I know due to time constraints I can’t keep coming back to you with all my questions. So I was hoping you could point me in the right direction. -G.D.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: It is great that you are reading the Bible again. As you quickly learned, it can be mysterious. Let me try a few brief answers:

First, it is possible the devil wasn’t 100% sure Jesus was God. Notice the devil’s use of the conditional: “If you are the Son of God …”

Second, Matthew 7:6 (“Do not give what is holy to dogs, or throw your pearls before swine …”) could mean that we shouldn’t keep presenting the faith or things of the faith to someone who is stubborn and resistant to the message. That might only antagonize and further alienate them. The Holy Spirit has a time and place for souls to be open to the Gospel, and it helps to try to detect when the right timing comes along.

Third, John the Baptist might have asked that question for the sake of his skeptical disciples. But perhaps John himself had difficulties. This shouldn’t shock us — faith is always being tested. It is understandable, after all, that John wondered how it was that he ended up in prison, after having the privilege of pointing out the Lamb of God to the world. Also, John said that the Christ would “clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the granary, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire” (Matthew 3:12). John might have been expecting a Messiah who would have overcome evil through force, rather than through suffering and the cross.

Fourth, part of the mystery of the incarnation is that Jesus showed his divinity or his human nature in more pronounced ways at various times. He would ask, “Who touched me?” yet at other times he could read peoples’ hearts. So it is possible Jesus as true man didn’t know about John’s death. Of course, in his divine nature Jesus would have known it, but as he wished to fully become man, in his human nature he had to “inquire for himself about what one in the human condition can learn only from experience” (CCC 472).

These answers aren’t exhaustive, of course, and there can be other explanations. That is part of the richness of Scripture.

It might be helpful simply to get a good Catholic Bible and read the footnotes. There are numerous commentaries available on the Internet too. A particularly good companion to the Gospels is Father John Bartunek’s The Better Part.

The key thing is to keep reading — and living — the Gospel message.

“Ask a Priest: Did the Devil Know Who Jesus Was?” Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Aren’t Some Catholic Doctrines Outdated?”

Q: How do you reconcile today’s world with the current Catholic doctrine? The Catholic Church is quite conservative; not only this, but some of its doctrines seem irrelevant and outdated. It would be wrong to expect the Church to change its stance on particular issues because it is offensive to some or because most do not follow. The Catholic Church claims to have the fullness of the Gospel. How would I know if this is true? I have talked to a few Christian denominations, and plenty do not have a good view of the Catholic Church. Jehovah Witnesses claim to have the truth, as do other denominations. There are many interpretations about who Jesus was, is, and how he would respond today’s issues. Why is the Catholic Church concerned with how people use their sexuality, which is a very private affair? -L.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: You mention that the Catholic Church claims to have the fullness of the Gospel. That is a good place to begin. That would mean that the Gospel — coming from Christ, who is God — doesn’t change. Jesus is the fullness of God’s revelation to the world, and what he taught is meant for all peoples in all times.

So it would make sense that any church that claims to have the fullness of the Gospel wouldn’t change that Gospel, correct? And what did Jesus say about matters of, say, sexuality? He told the woman caught in adultery, “Go, [and] from now on do not sin any more” (John 8:11). He also warned that “everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:28).

So if Jesus is concerned about how people use their sexuality, there must be a serious reason. It isn’t just a “very private affair.”

Sins against the flesh are offenses against God because they are misuses of the gift of sex that the Almighty gives us. Sex is sacred because it enables spouses to express intimate union as well as partake in procreation, where couples join God in raising up new human life. That is why sex is such a sacred power.

As to belief in the Church as such, well, no one can prove the veracity of Catholicism. That is why faith is needed. But let’s say this: God made faith as well as reason. I invite you to go deep into any religion you want. You will likely find that no other religion is as deep and broad as Catholicism. Moreover, there is nothing unreasonable about it; it might go beyond reason occasionally, but it doesn’t go against reason.

Whatever the Church teaches can be linked to Scripture or Tradition, which is the oral transmission of everything that wasn’t written explicitly in the Bible. (An example of Tradition is the list, or canon, of books in the Bible; where did that list come from? It came from Tradition.)

True, there are many interpretations of who Jesus is and what he would say today. That is why he sent the Holy Spirit to guide his Church, the Catholic Church. “I have much more to tell you, but you cannot bear it now. But when he comes, the Spirit of truth, he will guide you to all truth” (John 16:12-13). We believe the Holy Spirit guides the magisterium, the teaching authority, of the Church in order to keep us from false doctrines. That is why you can find continuity in what the Church teaches from the very beginning.

Many other religions or denominations have changed their teachings over the centuries — for instance, allowing contraception and women priests. If they can change their teachings on such fundamental issues, isn’t that a sign that they might be trying to win favor with the world rather than proclaim what Christianity held from the very start?

Perhaps it might help you to go deeper into some of the Church’s teachings. A few sites that might help are the Chastity Project and the Theology of the Body. I hope this helps. God bless.

“Ask a Priest: Aren’t Some Catholic Doctrines Outdated?” Read More »

A Cure for Discouragement | A Regnum Christi Retreat Guide for Easter with Fr. John Bartunek, LC

A Cure for Discouragement: A Retreat Guide for Easter

The appearances of Jesus after his Resurrection, as recorded in the New Testament, are, to be honest, kind of confusing.  The people he appears to don’t recognize him right away, even though they knew him before. Critics of Christianity attribute these appearances to the imagination of Christ’s followers.  They say that the first Christians simply invented the Resurrection, and that’s why the Gospel accounts are so confusing. Pope Benedict XVI attributes the unique character of these Gospel pages to one simple cause: Christ’s Resurrection itself was something entirely, radically new. He writes:  “It was an utterly unique experience, which burst open the normal boundaries of experience and yet for the disciples was quite beyond doubt.  This explains the unique character of the Resurrection accounts…” In this Easter Retreat Guide, A Cure for Discouragement, we will dive into one of these accounts, our Lord’s appearance to the disciples on the road to Emmaus.

  • The first meditation will look at the cause of their discouragement.
  • The second meditation will contemplate our Lord’s cure for it.
  • And the conference will offer practical tips to help us do for others what Jesus did for them.

A Cure for Discouragement: A Retreat Guide for Easter Read More »

Regnum Christi Spirituality Center Ask a Priest

“Ask a Priest: Do Matthew and Luke contradict each other on Jesus’ early life?”

Q: In Matthew 2, it says Mary, Joseph and Jesus were in Bethlehem, and (verse 13) after the wise men left, the angel told them to flee to Egypt. So they went to Egypt and stayed there till Herod died. But in Luke 2, Mary, Joseph and Jesus go to Jerusalem for their purification when Jesus is a baby, and verse 39 says then they returned to Nazareth where the child grew and became strong, etc. This seems like a contradiction. Can you explain? -T.D.

Answered by Fr. Edward McIlmail, LC

A: There really isn’t a contradiction here. Rather, each Gospel writer is selectively using facts in order to convey a certain message.

The real sequence of events was probably this: Jesus was born, and then some weeks later he was presented in the Temple. Sometime later — possibly months or a year or more later — the magi visited. After the magi left, the Holy Family fled to Egypt. Then, after the death of Herod, the Holy Family returned to Palestine and settled in Nazareth. The Gospel texts seem to support this version of the sequence of events. I’ll explain why.

It is highly probable that the magi visited the Baby Jesus a significant amount of time after his birth. Two texts indicate this. Matthew 2:11 says of the magi, “on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother.” The mention of a house indicates that the Holy Family by this time was more established in Bethlehem; Mary and Joseph no longer had to rely on a manger (a feeding trough for animals) for the Baby Jesus. They obviously had found better accommodations by then.

Matthew 2:16 goes on to say that Herod “ordered the massacre of all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had ascertained from the magi.” That passage indicates that Herod perceived a lapse of time of up to two years between the appearance of the star, the birth of Our Lord and the arrival of the magi.

The Gospel according to Matthew would have been keen to mention the flight into Egypt and the subsequent return since these events help show how Jesus fulfilled the Scriptures — in this case, Hosea 11:1. “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

The Gospel according to Luke, on the other hand, chose to emphasize (in quick succession) the Presentation in the Temple, the Holy Family’s return to Galilee, and the Finding of Jesus in the Temple at age 12. The writer, by choosing a simpler story line, could shift the scene from the Temple to Nazareth and back to the Temple again. That each Gospel writer was selective about details in the life of Jesus is obvious since the Matthew account doesn’t mention the Presentation or the Finding in the Temple.

Hence, we could say there is no contradiction in the Gospel accounts. I hope this helps. God bless.

“Ask a Priest: Do Matthew and Luke contradict each other on Jesus’ early life?” Read More »

Scroll to Top

Looking for another country?

RC Near You

News & Resources

News & Resources

The Regnum Christi Mission

The Regnum Christi Identity

Alex Kucera

Atlanta

Alex Kucera has lived in Atlanta, GA, for the last 46 years. He is one of 9 children, married to his wife Karmen, and has 3 girls, one grandson, and a granddaughter on the way. Alex joined Regnum Christi in 2007. Out of the gate, he joined the Helping Hands Medical Missions apostolate and is still participating today with the Ghana Friendship Mission.

In 2009, Alex was asked to be the Atlanta RC Renewal Coordinator for the Atlanta Locality to help the RC members with the RC renewal process. Alex became a Group Leader in 2012 for four of the Atlanta Men’s Section Teams and continues today. Running in parallel, in 2013, Alex became a Team Leader and shepherded a large team of good men.

Alex was honored to be the Atlanta Mission Coordinator between 2010 to 2022 (12 years), coordinating 5-8 Holy Week Mission teams across Georgia. He also created and coordinated missions at a parish in Athens, GA, for 9 years. Alex continues to coordinate Holy Week Missions, Advent Missions, and Monthly missions at Good Shepherd Catholic Church in Cumming, GA.

From 2016 to 2022, Alex also served as the Men’s Section Assistant in Atlanta. He loved working with the Men’s Section Director, the Legionaries, Consecrated, and Women’s Section leadership teams.

Alex is exceptionally grateful to the Legionaries, Consecrated, and many RC members who he’s journeyed shoulder to shoulder, growing his relationship with Christ and others along the way. He knows that there is only one way, that’s Christ’s Way, with others!